

What does the WPM say about . . . . ? |
Individual choices about private personal behaviours are
matters for personal choice. The major criterion is whether physical or psychological harm
is done to other people, especially vulnerable people (eg children), or to animals.
The WPM does not condemn, nor does it favour, any such preferences or
behaviours where they do no harm to others (eg, between freely consenting adults). The
choice is up to the individual conscience in the light of local legislation. We regard it
as absurd for religious bodies to become involved in dictating private personal behaviour
that does no harm.
Our position here is the same as for sexual preferences: the WPM does not condemn, nor does it favour, use of any recreational susbtance. The choice is up to the individual conscience in the light of local legislation. In general, self-harm is not consistent with a pantheist viewpoint, but what constitutes self-harm is open to wide interpretation.
We do not have any official position on this, because it is possible to argue a pantheist case in favour of vegetarianism, or in defence of meat-eating. We have members who are vegetarian or vegan and members who are not. We have an egroup just for vegetarian issues. We are almost all agreed that farming methods should be humane and environmentally friendly and should respect animals' rights to a natural life
We are opposed to all forms of discrimination.
We are a religious non-profit body. We do not endorse any particular political party or policy and we have members from both ends of the political spectrum and the middle. We do have some basic social and environmental ideals, and these are laid out in the credo clauses three and four.
The credo does not support belief in a conscious personal individual afterlife but envisages that our elements merge back into nature while our memories live on in living people through kindnesses, actions, creations, descendants and so on.
The WPM takes a naturalistic and scientific position. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. There may be anomalous phenomena that are as yet unexplained, but if these are proved to be real, they must be the result of natural physical processes.

Page posted 2000. Contact us: info@pantheism.net