Scientific pantheism is called scientific not because it claims to be a science, but
because it adopts a scientific approach to reality to complement its religious and
aesthetic approach:
1. It accepts the results of science, while being fully aware that science is not
static, and that facts and theories change.
2. It respects empirical evidence and is based on evidence rather than faith in
improbabilities and impossibilities.
3. It is based on investigation of reality rather than on revelation in ancient books.
4. It has a basically materialist paradigm, which is also the basis of science. (But see
below for the definition of matter).
5. It respects Occam's razor by not multiplying unnecessary entities. Where two theories
have equal predictive power, it would prefer the simpler theory.
6. It remains in principle revisable in the light of new evidence and theory.
However, scientific pantheism is not blindly uncritical of science:
6. You do not have to be a scientist, or even to know anything about science to be a
scientific pantheist. All you need is a reverential attitude to nature and the universe.
7. While we rely on science and the senses for a proper understanding of the world around
us, we attach great importance to spiritual aspects of life such as emotions, religious,
mystical and aesthetic feelings and experiences. 8. Scientific pantheism does not believe
that science will necessarily be able to explain everything in the universe. Above all,
the fundamental mystery of the sheer existence of matter/energy is likely to remain
impenetrable.
9. Scientific pantheism condemns the pursuit of scientific knowledge by unethical means,
including cruelty to animals and experiments on humans without fully informed consent.
10. Scientific pantheism does not unthinkingly endorse the products of modern technology -
in particular, it wishes to see all technology that damages the environment replaced by
non-damaging technology that is sustainable indefinitely.