If you can accept and love nature's violence as well as her serenity,
then
you're a real pantheist. I personally love the violence just as
strongly as
I love the serenity, and feel that sometimes the violence can express
the
power more clearly.
My family's emerging purpose is to elevate ecological / environmental
concerns to a "core" value. That's where Pantheism fits so well for
us. By
core values, I refer to those values held so closely that we take them
as
givens in our decision making. For most people in our society (and for
me
too, I have to admit) my survival ranks highest, followed closely by
the
present and future security of my family, followed by not killing
anyone,
etc.... Somewhere down the list is leaving the Earth healthier when I
leave
than when I came. What I hope to do through my own efforts and
connecting
to people in this and other groups is to move the Earth First value
MUCH
higher in my own and the worlds rankings. RICHARD HERVEY.
Nature
I live on the top floor and have a view of the city which is
magnificent.
It is embraced by the beautiful trees outside my window. I have
meditated
on them for five years now! I am not kidding. They are always offering
me
new insights. Right now some pine cones are forming on one of them.
The process... is incredible. DOREEN ESBERK
The violence of nature
We have all related stories of the beauty in our universe.
Hale-Bopp,
the Northern Lights, The Milky Way, the cool silence of a forest after
a
spring rain. But what about the power and strength of our own planet.
Is
that not what we are all about too?
Yesterday, here in the Philadelphia area, we experienced a series
of
fierce thunderstorms through the area. A wall cloud rumbled through,
with a
distinct line to the cells. Mammatus was very prevalent and we were a
little concerned for a funnel cloud or even a tornado, which we don't
see
here very often.
The clouds rolled in from the southeast, a harbinger of bad things
to
come. The clouds moved in very quickly, about 45 kts (52 mph) which is
very
fast, the mammatus was then visible and then the hail started. We were
in
our car and our kids had never seen hail before. It was about 1/2" to
3/4"
in diameter and it came down in such sheets my wife and I were sure the
car
was going to look like the surface of the moon.
Then the rains began and visibility went down to 0. All of a
sudden,
the flashes of lightning were blinding. Several struck no more than 50
feet
from our car. I could feel the hair on the back of my neck raise from
the
static electricity. Also I was scared out of my (you know what). Our
three
girls were just screaming with excitement (they weren't afraid because
they
know the car is one of the safest places to be) my wife was scared,
because
she had been through a tornado, and this was a prelude of what happens
before it hits.
I assured her it was just a great show the atmosphere was putting
on.
What I was doing was reassuring myself. But just as we were getting a
feel
of dread in our stomachs, the storm ended as quickly as it began. We
were
awe struck. We were even more amazed to fine out that no one was
injured
and that it seemed everyone had escaped any major damage to property.
In
all my years in meteorology I had never experienced that raw power
before.
It was scary, fascinating, and awesome. I guess, like everyone, you
only
think of the quiet, tranquil scenes of nature. But, there are those
moments
that are just as thought provoking. When the sky goes from sunny to
stormy,
the birds hightail it to safe haven, the boats dock in the nearest cove
and
nature puts on it's show. Take care. LEE ANDERSON
I love lightning. I'm not a storm-chaser and I wouldn't be. But
I'm
only too happy if I get the chance to witness some spectacular
displays.
For me they are one of things that induce the most intense pantheistic
mystical feelings.
We don't get them often in London - but last year there was a
brilliant show over Hampstead Heath - no rain at the time, just ropes
of
lightning curving down and up again into the clouds, like hammocks. My
son
and I were sitting in the open - a stupid thing to do, since we were
the
tallest objects for quite a distance. I have been in a plane struck by
lightning - it happened too fast to be scared - and a bolt hit about
three
yards from my car once.
I am also crazy about volcanoes. I tape every programme about
them. I
would love to watch a lake of bubbling lava. I'm planning soon to visit
Stromboli, off Sicily, which has a permanently active volcano that
(usually) is quite safe to watch.
We love nature and the universe for their beauty, and we revere
them
for their power - and that includes the power of destruction as well as
creation. These displays are like an epiphany.
PAUL HARRISON
Are animals pantheists?
Saturday, 24 May 1997. Jenny my Sheepdog had its second litter of pups,
six
fine puppies, two dogs and four bitches. Sam the father was at the
birth
but was not that interested, Pip the Lakeland terrier bitch doesn't
know
yet, she will be jealous. Sam has kept up the defence of the road from
trespassers. In human law the road is a public right of way, but to Sam
this his territory, our ownership of the land is only recognised by us
humans. Sam's Darshana is to chase cars. RICHARD TRAFFORD.
Evolution
All individual animals, if left unrestrained by Nature, would
tend to wreck it. For example, if rabbits could breed without any
controls, they would dig up and chew down and prevent trees from
growing
etc etc. In nature there are predators that control rabbits and stop
them
doing this. If they could, predators would breed until they killed
every
last one of their prey - and ate themselves out of existence.
Sometimes
this actually happens (predator-prey cycles, with numbers zooming up
and
down like a switchback).
For me, Nature's controls are not rational: they just are, they
just evolve as a marvelous system for creating dynamic balance. If
there
is a niche, some creature will develop to fill that niche. Evolution
is
so creative that every niche gets filled - so any part of nature that
produces excess, some other part will develop to control it. That's
how
Gaia works. It appears to be the working of a mind, but it is really
the
working of matter and its laws. But it's miraculous, wonderful,
beautiful, awesome all the same.
The problem lies with us humans. We have temporarily escaped
nature's controls and are imposing many kinds of damage on most living
creatures and ecosystems. We are doing this at a speed which is faster
than nature's ability to throw up mechanisms to control us. I guess
it's
only by learning to work with nature rather than against it that some
kind of balance may be restored.
PAUL HARRISON
Environment
If we do not defend the earth and its ecosystem we all die; it is just
a =
matter of time. If nature chooses to kill us in our own waste to fix a
=
problem it is no fault but our own, and so be it. REGINALD ATKINS.
A Myth of the Fall in pantheism?
The story ("mythos" means story) of the "fall" has at least three main
versions: (1) the Judaeo-Christian (the separation from God of which
Christians like Augustine make a very big deal); all human sinfulness,
and
hence poverty, injustice, social strife, etc., derives from the
original
sin; (2) the Marxist, according to which social solidarity and mutual
caring were quite high, and competitiveness was at a minimum, in early
society (primitive communism), and the development of private property
and
classes was the origin of most of our problems (scientific and
technological ignorance being the exceptions), and (3) what I suppose
you
could call the environmentalist version, of which Paul provides a
variant
on the SP site, according to which most of our problems derive from our
separation from Gaia. In each of these versions, things go from bad to
worse, with occasional ups and downs, until something occurs that
permits
the possibility of a reunion. For Christians the possibility of a
reunion
is provided by the incarnation of J.C. and his eventual return, for
Marxists by the development of the productive forces and the emergence
of a
class (the propertyless working class) to end all classes, and for
pantheists by the emergence of pantheist consciousness and the
lifestyle
(and economic and political changes?) which follow from it. JAN
GARRET
Are machines sacred?
When I see a skyscraper, or a train, or the architecture of Frank Lloyd
Wright, I am moved as much as when I see a redwood, a river, or a
rain-forest. I don't understand why this is such a problem; the feeling
I
get is that this is in some way a betrayal of Pantheism.
You stress the problems of creating a dualism; I feel that this is
exactly
what you are doing by saying that Man-made objects are not also
Nature-made. If the point of Pantheism is to show us that we are in
accord
with the Universe and the Earth, then the products of using Nature
respectfully should also be regarded as part of it; I don't see how you
can
praise the Universe, the Earth, the Mind, but not the amazing products
of
the latter.
I believe that appearing anti-Man will reduce people's affinity for
Pantheism. I always wanted the central tenets of Sci-Pan to be:
Divine Cosmos
Sacred Earth
Glorious Man
SAIF PATEL.
Digest
index.
Scientific
pantheism
index.
![]() |